Social Engineering the Machine:
How to Get Smarter Answers from AI

October 22, 2025

By Nicholas Johnson, Founder of Ataviz Consulting

When we talk about social engineering in cybersecurity, we mean manipulating humans into revealing information or taking actions they normally wouldn’t.

But here’s a twist: you can social-engineer large language models (LLMs) too, not to “hack” them, but to coax better thinking out of them.

These aren’t backdoors or exploits. They’re prompts that change the AI’s behavior by framing context, tone, or stakes (much like you’d do with a human expert).

And just like with people, the way you ask the question often determines the quality of the answer.

Let’s look at a few techniques that consistently elevate the output, whether you’re a curious first-timer or a veteran IT leader exploring advanced prompt design.

1. The Audience Effect

Prompt:

“You’re leading a packed workshop of junior developers. Explain why serverless architecture matters, and anticipate their biggest question.”

This works because it shifts the AI from informing to performing.

When it imagines an audience, the structure, pacing, and examples all improve. It starts teaching, not just describing... offering analogies, questions, even humor.

If you want clarity and engagement, give the model a stage.

2. The Disagreement Frame

Prompt:

“My colleague says containerization is overrated. Defend or disprove that.”

This triggers critical thinking instead of explanation.

By introducing tension, the model weighs arguments, cites use cases, and considers trade-offs.

It’s a great way to escape the AI’s default “neutral summarizer” mode and get something that sounds more like a peer review than a Wikipedia entry.

3. The “Obviously” Challenge

Prompt:

“Obviously, Python is the best choice for enterprise apps, right?”

Ironically, this bait often produces balanced, well-reasoned analysis.

The word “obviously” puts pressure on the model to correct overconfidence, pushing it to surface exceptions, edge cases, and counterarguments.

When you want a nuanced answer, start with an overconfident statement and watch the AI push back.

4. The Constraint Trick

Prompt:

“Explain blockchain using only sports metaphors.”

Artificial constraints unlock creativity. They force the model to reach into unusual corners of its training data, combining ideas in fresh, sometimes delightful ways.

This is how you move from “accurate” to “memorable.”

In technical consulting, it’s the same principle as whiteboarding a problem without the jargon first.

5. The High-Stakes Filter

Prompt:

“Let’s bet $100, is this network diagram efficient or not? Justify your answer.”

The bet is imaginary, but the scrutiny becomes real.

Adding fake stakes makes the AI slow down and double-check its reasoning. It hedges, considers counterpoints, and tests its own assumptions (much like a human who doesn’t want to lose a wager).

Use this to pressure-test an idea before it hits production.

6. The “Version 2.0” Upgrade

Prompt:

“Give me Version 2.0 of this onboarding process.”

“Improve this” leads to tweaks. “Version 2.0” leads to innovation.

It implies a sequel, a reimagining, not just an edit. The model starts thinking about what’s next, not just what’s wrong.

This framing is especially powerful for product design, IT strategy, or marketing concepts that need evolutionary thinking.

What’s Really Happening Here

None of these prompts actually trick the AI.

They tap into latent behavioral modes the model learned from human patterns: teaching, debating, performing, defending, and creating.

When you use language that mimics social dynamics, you unlock a different subset of those patterns.

For newcomers, this means you can get richer answers with simple reframing.

For IT veterans, it’s a glimpse into the next layer of human–AI interaction: prompt-level psychology.

You’re not just telling the machine what to do, you’re teaching it how to think about what it’s doing.

-- Your Hidden CTO

• YourHiddenCTO Patreon

---